Categorized | Personal |

Vote This Post DownVote This Post Up (+5 rating, 1 votes)
Loading ... Loading ...

Jajah and Rebtel: my thoughts

Posted on 27 September 2006

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Jajah and Rebtel seem to be two VoIP services about which the buzz over the blogsphere is growing more and more.

I already gave my thoughts on Jajah in the past, but now, since they have gone mobile, I would like to go in deep trying to verify what’s really happening around this VoIP service.
Moreover, yesterday I had the opportunity to give Rebtel a try (even if the test call hasn’t worked), so I would like to share my thoughts with you as well.

Let’s start with Jajah.
Basically, technically speaking, it works as a third party call control. Through a web page, you insert the number of your friend and specify the number where you want to be called back.
At this point Jajah servers call you, and a voice (btw: speaking a very bad Italian…) tells you that your friend is going to be called. Then you are connected to your friend’s phone.

I’d like to analyze this experience in the feet of a normal user. The driver for using this service is just one: money saving. No value added services, just money saving. Let’s break this subject into two points: from your PC and from your mobile.

Using a PC, the user experience is pretty easy. I can say it’s not difficult to setup a phone call. So, if I can save money, I have an interesting driver to do that. If the friend I’m calling is not a Jajah user and my call was from Italy to Italy, I’d pay 0.0230 EUR per minute. Not bad, but not even so good. Otherwise, if both numbers are fixed lines and my friend is a Jajah’s users, then the call is completely free.

Using a mobile phone the story is a little bit different. First of all, no free calls are available. Secondly, the user experience is worse, since I have to open an java/symbian software to use the service.
Moreover, we have to take into account the cost I incur for connecting to Jajah’s servers. I don’t know really how many KBs are exchanged between my mobile and their servers, but it’s clear that there’s a hidden cost there that we have to take into account.
I had to wait 20 seconds for the call to be setup from my mobile, but maybe it was just a matter of Murphy’s law :-) Unfortunately I couldn’t hear anyone on the other side. I’ll try again later.
Alec got some statistics:

*In excess of 1 million users have registered for Jajah today.
*All their core metrics – registered users, minutes, and so on — are doubling on a monthly basis.
*82% of visitors hitting their web site try the service right away (that’s a phenomenal conversion rate), which Roman attributes to the ease with which you can make your initial call.
*They’re earning $10/month per user, with 30% margins. I estimate that means that they’re probably paying for about 550 minutes of traffic per user per month, but getting paid for 400 minutes.
*As volume has increased, their termination costs have decreased by 50% since February
*40% of revenues come from Europe. That’s also where the largest pain is.

In particular he says:

I should note that some Jajah competitors I spoke with expressed doubts about the veracity of some of these claims. My opinion? Jajah mobile could change the mobile landscape very quickly, making them one of the most important VoIP companies in the market today. It’s natural to find that a little too good to be true.

To be honest, I have doubts about these claims as well…

Rebtel
I think this service has basically two opposite faces: on one side, at a first sight, their business plan seems much attractive; but, on the other hand, in my opinion this service lacks in something which is essential for the success of a service like that: it must be easy to use.

Aswath well describes Rebtel’s user-experience in this post:

For $1 a week, you get two numbers, one local to your calling area and another local to your designated buddy. When one of you want to call the other, that person will dial their local number allocated by Rebtel; in turn Rebtel will ring the other person’s phone number. The called party can hangup within 30 seconds and dial their local access number allocated by Rebtel to be connected to the buddy and they can talk for free as long as they desire.

Some questions arise:

  • is your friend willing to pay to talk to you ? I’m calling him and asking him to call a local number to talk to me. Is it always reasonable ?
  • this said, which is the subset of users which will find this service useful ? who I’m going to ask for money ?
  • who is willing to remember yet another phone number ?

In general I can agree with the general approach. Rebtel understood users’ preferred device is their mobile phone. But, Apple and Google teach us that ease and the meticulous care of the user experience is fundamental for a service/product to be successful.

I hope that investors (Index already invested in Skype…) already answered all the questions above.
Hey guys, 20M$ is a lot of money ;-)

Conclusions
Both services are going to the Voice 2.0 direction. As a professional involved in the VoIPsphere, I really appreciate that. This means that VoIP is not dead yet :-)
At the same time, I think I’m missing something out. I would like (I think I’m not alone…) to get these questions answered:

- how many users are REALLY willing to pay for these services ? how many are willing to USE these services ?
- is there available place for another Skype-like deal ?

I’ve seen many people in the blogsphere writing posts where they praise Jajah and Rebtel. Unfortunately I use to arise questions rather than being excited too quickly. And, moreover, I usually tend to praise a service/application just if I personally use it because I find it useful.

Jeff Pulver, who I estimate for his great vision, drafted a great picture of Rebtel:

Rebtel is one of the most exciting startups that I have gotten to know this year. While on the surface they may appear to some people to be a “mobile arbitrage play”, there is a lot more going on under the hood that meets the eye. The team of people at Rebtel are both revolutionaries and visionaries and they fully understand the value of “voice as an application” and underlying power of SIP and IP Communications. Simply put, Rebtel is well positioned to become a major force in the emerging world of consumer empowered Fixed Mobile Convergence (FMC).

He also writes:

One of the challenges that any startup faces is being understood. And I find it fascinating how some friends in the blogosphere hear about a new company and make certain underlying assumptions about them and never actually look deep under the hood.

So, what am I missing out ?

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

This post was written by:

Luca Filigheddu - who has written 1883 posts on LucaFiligheddu.com.

Luca is currently CEO at Abbeynet, a company specialized in VoIP and Web 2.0.

Contact the author

3 Comments For This Post

  1. Jeff Pulver says:

    Happy to connect up in person when I am in Rome for VON Italy. Rebtel is playing 100% in the SIP domain. Think about what this means in terms of the way ‘phone numbers’ might be managed. Now overlay the fact that Nokia plans to be selling hundreds of millions of E61 like devices that support SIP. Now try to connect the dots and you will see how Rebtel ends up becoming a major player in the world of Fixed Mobile Convergence thanks to end-user / consumer empowerment.

  2. Stefan Timm says:

    JaJah’s founders are trying to tell the public in general and the investment community in particular that they have a better cost structure than their competitors as they hand over calls from the internet to the PSTN in a decentralized fashion. What a crap.

    Backbone cost ist not sensitive to distance. Where you hand over VoIP traffic for PSTN termination does not effect cost.

    Therefore I strongly believe the other claims like ARPU made by JaJah founders are not the least accurate and should be ignored if not declared lies.

    A fool who can’t see that.

  3. Greg Spector says:

    Luca - I feel compelled to clarify a few things.

    We charge $1 per week to use our services to talk to as many friends as you like for as long and as often as you want. If you don’t use the service one week we don’t bill you.

    If you ask your friend to call back there is no additional fee. All you and your friend pay for is your local minutes to your carrier.

    But asking your friend to call back is an option. If they don’t call back all you pay is a tiny per minute fee to cover the interconnect charge — 2 cents a minute, for example, from Stockholm to New York; or 4 cents a minute from San Francisco to Beijing. All the per minute rates on our website http://www.rebtel.com

    Also, Rebtel works with all mobile phones unless they’re broken. No software downloads.

    And with Rebtel, you set up the local numbers just once, they’re sent you your phones in text messages, and you can save them to your standard address book and dial from your standard address book forever. No numbers to remember. Just call your friend.

    Speaking of calling your friend — here’s my email address: greg@rebtel.com. I invite you and anyone reading your blog to drop me a note with their mobile number and I’ll set up a local number for you to call where you live to reach me in Stockholm this week, and you can see for yourself how easy it is to use and how great the sound quality is.

    It’s your call.

1 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. Rebtel Open in China says:

    Kramer auto Pingback[...] ease-of-use and start to alienate customers. You can read more on how this works at Rebtel from Luca and Aswath, or the view from 30,000 feet from Rebtel themselves. digg_url = [...]

Leave a Reply

Recent Readers

License

  • Creative Commons License
    This blog is published under a Creative Commons license.
  • Translate

    Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional
    中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish

    Sponsors