If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my
RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
[excerpt]After almost two months (overall) spent here in California, I’m getting more and more proofs that the US mobile market is immature.
I will try to summarize my point of view in regards of three main areas, that I personally consider some key areas where vendors and operators should focus their attention.[/excerpt]
Coverage
US is a big country, so coverage is really not good in many places. In Italy, you can get a great coverage on top of a mountain right now, while the other day in Saratoga (close to Palo Alto) both my mobile phones (AT&T and T-Mobile) were unusable. Something really rare in Italy nowadays. Besides this, many areas are poorly covered, so the signal strength is very low.
Freedom of choice
Why do I have to get only those crappy and old mobile phones that mobile operators include in their plans? In Palo Alto, Sunnyvale, San Francisco, Sacramento and many other towns, no way to get one of the latest Nokia N-series. I’ve been told that only three “specialized” shops have that stuff in the Bay area. Are you serious? “Specialized“?!? Something that you can get in any shopping centre in Italy? At least four people, looking at my N95, told me “what a great phone, European right? I love it, but can’t get it here”. Those are “normal” people that go to Walmart or Best Buy, and can’t get it.
The best you can get seems to be a Blackberry, great for emails but… very limited for all the other features. The problem here is that in Italy we use to be free to choose whatever mobile phone we want, then we plug whatever SIM card (aka operator) we want in it. That makes the market less dominated by operators that, on the contrary, must struggle to retain their users, since 90% of the market is not “linked” to any specific operator through a contract.
Pay to receive a call?
That’s what happen in Europe when you are roaming in a foreign state, but that’s what happen in the US if I call my friend that lives one block far!. In Italy, it would be a market killer. Outbound calls are generally a little bit more expensive, but you don’t pay to receive a call. I can assure you that it helps.
What Nokia is doing in the US with the blogger relation program is great, but this market needs more. There is a huge potential here but my perception is as US is 3-4 years behind. In many shops, I found mobile phones that I already have in my reliquary…


(No Ratings Yet)

















Add New Comment
Viewing 2 Comments
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Add New Comment
Trackbacks
(Trackback URL)
January 29, 2008 at 8:30 am
[...] Your page is on StumbleUpon [...]
March 3, 2008 at 4:54 pm
[...] seems they heard my complaint about the status of the US mobile market, where I could hardly find a ...
May 5, 2008 at 6:36 pm
[...] it seems that what I was looking forward to is finally happening. More choices and more services for US ...
September 29, 2008 at 6:09 am
[...] Blackberry. Why? Try to get a high end Nokia smartphone in California and here is the answer. As noticed ...