<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Ooma heading to the deadpool?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2008/04/is-ooma-heading-to-the-deadpool.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2008/04/is-ooma-heading-to-the-deadpool.html</link>
	<description>Social Media, VoIP and a lot of Tech News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:31:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Rodecker</title>
		<link>http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2008/04/is-ooma-heading-to-the-deadpool.html/comment-page-1#comment-7891</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rodecker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=2175#comment-7891</guid>
		<description>Is OOMA dead now?  Our lines went dead today both inbound and outbound.  All 7 of our lines.  Is this how it ends?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is OOMA dead now?  Our lines went dead today both inbound and outbound.  All 7 of our lines.  Is this how it ends?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why There Is No More space for new VoIP Players &#124; LucaFiligheddu.com</title>
		<link>http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2008/04/is-ooma-heading-to-the-deadpool.html/comment-page-1#comment-6472</link>
		<dc:creator>Why There Is No More space for new VoIP Players &#124; LucaFiligheddu.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 22:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=2175#comment-6472</guid>
		<description>[...] saving only. From this standpoint, Ooma is an interesting example (unlike some premature signs of failure, it seems to be still alive and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] saving only. From this standpoint, Ooma is an interesting example (unlike some premature signs of failure, it seems to be still alive and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2008/04/is-ooma-heading-to-the-deadpool.html/comment-page-1#comment-5360</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=2175#comment-5360</guid>
		<description>The story is lame.  It references back to more Valleywag stories which a just a bunch of mis-information.  It&#039;s like printing a story that the sky is pink, and then referencing back to it in another story.  Some executives have left (unheard of, that never happens ) and gasp they ditched their PR firm!!!!  (that MUST mean disaster...).  It wouldn&#039;t surprise me if these negative stories were &quot;planted&quot; by the telcos or established VoIP services, since if ooma succeeds it will take away their business.  First, the comparison with phonegnome.  Ooma can completely replace your existing phone service, phonegnome is used in conjunction with your phone service.  It&#039;s apples and oranges, I&#039;ve used both... Second, the &quot;gasp&quot; cost.  Sure, ooma costs $400 for the unit, but it completely eliminates your monthly recurring, which for me was around $30.  I recoup that cost in less that 14 months, after that it is gravy.  Why people can&#039;t pull out their calculator and figure this out is a mystery to me.  I suppose if your credit cards are maxed out and you are living from paycheck to paycheck and can&#039;t budget your way out of a box, it may be an issue.  If that is the case though, perhaps its better you don&#039;t have phone service and save the dollars.  Third, ooma has a nest egg which will take quite some time to run through.  Their costs aren&#039;t the same as traditional voip vendors so they won&#039;t be running through their cash pile like drunken sailors.  Lame, Lame, Lame...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The story is lame.  It references back to more Valleywag stories which a just a bunch of mis-information.  It&#8217;s like printing a story that the sky is pink, and then referencing back to it in another story.  Some executives have left (unheard of, that never happens ) and gasp they ditched their PR firm!!!!  (that MUST mean disaster&#8230;).  It wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if these negative stories were &#8220;planted&#8221; by the telcos or established VoIP services, since if ooma succeeds it will take away their business.  First, the comparison with phonegnome.  Ooma can completely replace your existing phone service, phonegnome is used in conjunction with your phone service.  It&#8217;s apples and oranges, I&#8217;ve used both&#8230; Second, the &#8220;gasp&#8221; cost.  Sure, ooma costs $400 for the unit, but it completely eliminates your monthly recurring, which for me was around $30.  I recoup that cost in less that 14 months, after that it is gravy.  Why people can&#8217;t pull out their calculator and figure this out is a mystery to me.  I suppose if your credit cards are maxed out and you are living from paycheck to paycheck and can&#8217;t budget your way out of a box, it may be an issue.  If that is the case though, perhaps its better you don&#8217;t have phone service and save the dollars.  Third, ooma has a nest egg which will take quite some time to run through.  Their costs aren&#8217;t the same as traditional voip vendors so they won&#8217;t be running through their cash pile like drunken sailors.  Lame, Lame, Lame&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VoIP News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wednesday Links: Ooma Out?</title>
		<link>http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2008/04/is-ooma-heading-to-the-deadpool.html/comment-page-1#comment-5287</link>
		<dc:creator>VoIP News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wednesday Links: Ooma Out?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=2175#comment-5287</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8230; in an aptly tagged piece &#8212; Deathwatch. The blogosphere has caught on quickly and the rumor is flying like hot fire. What do you think? Is Ooma a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8230; in an aptly tagged piece &#8212; Deathwatch. The blogosphere has caught on quickly and the rumor is flying like hot fire. What do you think? Is Ooma a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Realtime Community &#124; Unified Communications</title>
		<link>http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2008/04/is-ooma-heading-to-the-deadpool.html/comment-page-1#comment-5298</link>
		<dc:creator>Realtime Community &#124; Unified Communications</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=2175#comment-5298</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;Is Ooma heading to the deadpool?&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->Is Ooma heading to the deadpool?<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
