<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Junction Networks Charges for On-Net VoIP Calls: Is VoIP 2.0 Behind the Corner?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2008/11/junction-networks-charges-for-on-net-voip-calls-is-voip-20-behind-the-corner.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2008/11/junction-networks-charges-for-on-net-voip-calls-is-voip-20-behind-the-corner.html</link>
	<description>Social Media, VoIP and a lot of Tech News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:49:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: socialmedian: Junction Networks Charges for On-Net VoIP Calls: Is VoIP 2.0 Behind the Corner?</title>
		<link>http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2008/11/junction-networks-charges-for-on-net-voip-calls-is-voip-20-behind-the-corner.html/comment-page-1#comment-6491</link>
		<dc:creator>socialmedian: Junction Networks Charges for On-Net VoIP Calls: Is VoIP 2.0 Behind the Corner?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=2948#comment-6491</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] } $(&#039;fade&#039;).style.display=&#039;block&#039;; $(&#039;light&#039;).style.display=&#039;block&#039;; }                0 Clips     Junction Networks Charges for On-Net VoIP Calls: Is VoIP 2.0 Behind the Corner?     Source: LucaFiligheddu.com   1 day [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] } $(&#8216;fade&#8217;).style.display=&#8217;block&#8217;; $(&#8216;light&#8217;).style.display=&#8217;block&#8217;; }                0 Clips     Junction Networks Charges for On-Net VoIP Calls: Is VoIP 2.0 Behind the Corner?     Source: LucaFiligheddu.com   1 day [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reviewer OnLine</title>
		<link>http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2008/11/junction-networks-charges-for-on-net-voip-calls-is-voip-20-behind-the-corner.html/comment-page-1#comment-6485</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reviewer OnLine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=2948#comment-6485</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A New Voip Knocking At The Door...&lt;/strong&gt;


Image via Wikipedia

Today two news attracted my attention:

Voxbone announces iNum, Internet&#8217;s First Global Country Code
Calls between edgeBOX extensions, whether on-premise or around the world across Internet connections, will incur half-cent-...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A New Voip Knocking At The Door&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Image via Wikipedia</p>
<p>Today two news attracted my attention:</p>
<p>Voxbone announces iNum, Internet&#8217;s First Global Country Code<br />
Calls between edgeBOX extensions, whether on-premise or around the world across Internet connections, will incur half-cent-&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Wolpov</title>
		<link>http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2008/11/junction-networks-charges-for-on-net-voip-calls-is-voip-20-behind-the-corner.html/comment-page-1#comment-6486</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Wolpov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=2948#comment-6486</guid>
		<description>Thanks!  Let me clear up something about the 1/2 cent charge for on-network calls. If you want to call a SIP address using an edgebox PBX, Junction Networks doesn&#039;t charge for, nor do we really have anything to do with that Internet call.  BUT, let&#039;s say you have two offices with edgebox PBXs, one using IAX, one using SIP.  In order to place calls between them, you need a trunking provider that will stay in the call and perform protocol translation.  That costs us bandwidth and processor utilization so we have to charge.  The same goes for calls between conflicting codec users, NAT conflicts, etc.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The important distinction is that a TRUNKING service is nothing more than a POTS line delivered over an IP connection.  INTERNET calls, such as pure SIP address calls, that don&#039;t require TRUNKING services, should not be sent to a TRUNKING provider but rather over the Internet. The routing for  TRUNK vs. Other should be handled in the dial plan of the PBX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!  Let me clear up something about the 1/2 cent charge for on-network calls. If you want to call a SIP address using an edgebox PBX, Junction Networks doesn&#39;t charge for, nor do we really have anything to do with that Internet call.  BUT, let&#39;s say you have two offices with edgebox PBXs, one using IAX, one using SIP.  In order to place calls between them, you need a trunking provider that will stay in the call and perform protocol translation.  That costs us bandwidth and processor utilization so we have to charge.  The same goes for calls between conflicting codec users, NAT conflicts, etc.  </p>
<p>The important distinction is that a TRUNKING service is nothing more than a POTS line delivered over an IP connection.  INTERNET calls, such as pure SIP address calls, that don&#39;t require TRUNKING services, should not be sent to a TRUNKING provider but rather over the Internet. The routing for  TRUNK vs. Other should be handled in the dial plan of the PBX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entrepreneurship</title>
		<link>http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2008/11/junction-networks-charges-for-on-net-voip-calls-is-voip-20-behind-the-corner.html/comment-page-1#comment-6489</link>
		<dc:creator>Entrepreneurship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=2948#comment-6489</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;voice provider for their “office-in-a-box” solution. edgeBOX is “an integrated device aimed at the SMB market and including a full-fledged IP - PBX , wireless access point, router, file, e-mail and VPN server”. …   The rest is here: Junction Networks Charges for On-Net VoIP Calls: Is VoIP 2.0 …&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->voice provider for their “office-in-a-box” solution. edgeBOX is “an integrated device aimed at the SMB market and including a full-fledged IP &#8211; PBX , wireless access point, router, file, e-mail and VPN server”. …   The rest is here: Junction Networks Charges for On-Net VoIP Calls: Is VoIP 2.0 …<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
