Categorized | Marketing, Web 2.0 |

Vote This Post DownVote This Post Up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Are Your Revenues “Noise” ?

Posted on 05 March 2008

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Are you making $300.000/month with your startup? This limits your potential. You can do much more but you don’t know yet.

In a nutshell, this is the concept expressed by Jeff Clavier from the VC SoftTech. Some small startups that are quickly successful, think they don’t actually need money from VCs, limiting their true potential.

Mmm, can’t disagree more. If you are capable of making 300 thousand / month from your startup with very low costs, in my opinion you are doing very well and should be proud of it. Do you really care to “scale” and become very, very ,very big? I don’t think so. You can do more, for sure, and much better, but this doesn’t necessarily mean you have to go to raise money from VCs.

That said, I think that for some lucky Web 2.0 companies that can choose, the VC way is not the best one. VCs bet on you and on other companies, but likely 90% of them are going to fail, and yours could be in that 90%. On the contrary, most companies in this space cannot choose and this is the only available choice (aside from private seeds of course). VCs are not happy with “normal” and “fair” results, they want the BIG exit and this is not necessarily what you want.

Anyway, I have to agree with Jeff in one point: some companies don’t think big enough, reason why the VC world is far from being mature and well developed in Europe.

, ,

This post was written by:

Luca Filigheddu - who has written 1886 posts on LucaFiligheddu.com.

Luca is currently CEO at Abbeynet, a company specialized in VoIP and Web 2.0.

Contact the author

1 Comments For This Post

  1. Brody says:

    To the startups that are making $300K/month, congratulations. For the ones that aren’t, visit http://www.sun.com/startup to get pro-grade x64 severs, free tech support and access to lots of missing pieces aka, my definition of a ‘Series A VC funding’ equipment setup but directly to the little guy. Cheers :)

3 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. HipMojo.com says:

    links from Technoratis in the $300,000 a month range–a range that most companies made up of three guys and a credit-card funded Amazon S3 account would kill for–is “noise” that distracts them from their potential. Some folks are outrightdisagreeingwith the argument. I hate raising the East Coast vs. West Coast style of investing because all VCs are fundamentally similar, but I think this is a West Coast mentality. East Coast investors certainly seem more interested in a company

  2. HipMojo.com says:

    links from Technoratis in the $300,000 a month range–a range that most companies made up of three guys and a credit-card funded Amazon S3 account would kill for–is “noise” that distracts them from their potential. Some folks are outrightdisagreeingwith the argument. I hate raising the East Coast vs. West Coast style of investing because all VCs are fundamentally similar, but I think this is a West Coast mentality. East Coast investors certainly seem more interested in a company

  3. Techmeme says:

    links from Technorati+ Discussion:LucaFiligheddu.com

Leave a Reply

Recent Readers

License

  • Creative Commons License
    This blog is published under a Creative Commons license.
  • Translate

    Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional
    中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish

    Sponsors